Can you give me some feedback please on the performance of the new server. I don't think it is yet configured for optimal performance so it may have some bottlenecks where page requests are all queueing up.
Also did you get the landing page on the old server this morning (you would know if you did), or did you come straight on to the forum?
Full Version: *** HELP REQUIRED **
It's pretty slow most of the time so far.
Also, I have to log in every time I visit.
Also, I have to log in every time I visit.
Have not been able get on all day.
Very Very Very Slow.
Very Very Very Slow.
QUOTE (youngseal @ Dec 12 2007, 07:09 PM) 
Have not been able get on all day.
Very Very Very Slow.
Very Very Very Slow.
Seems back to normal for me now, login works again aswell.
Hopefully the rocket fuel I've just added has worked. Still got my fingers crossed though it's all trial and error this!!
May I question the need in all this server re-routing and so on, if I may?
There didn't seem to be any visible need for it, as the board had been working fine for a while, and all the work started the day after Bear's famous post and following the subsequent announcement by the football club, mentioning the name of this forum.
Coincidence?
There didn't seem to be any visible need for it, as the board had been working fine for a while, and all the work started the day after Bear's famous post and following the subsequent announcement by the football club, mentioning the name of this forum.
Coincidence?
Only if you can explain to me this user_beancounters output from the old server
I'm particularly interested in knowing your considered opinion about the 114456 kernel memory failures since the last reboot.
I'm particularly interested in knowing your considered opinion about the 114456 kernel memory failures since the last reboot.
QUOTE
[root@lvps212-241-194-173 root]# cat /proc/user_beancounters
Version: 2.5
uid resource held maxheld barrier limit failcnt
237024: kmemsize 4122064 4169288 6839394 7523333 114456
lockedpages 0 0 333 333 0
privvmpages 49619 49661 194700 214170 0
shmpages 9635 9635 19470 19470 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numproc 41 42 166 166 0
physpages 27650 27653 0 2147483647 0
vmguarpages 0 0 32450 2147483647 0
oomguarpages 28087 28090 32450 2147483647 0
numtcpsock 16 16 166 166 827
numflock 10 10 265 291 0
numpty 2 2 16 16 0
numsiginfo 0 1 1024 1024 0
tcpsndbuf 6660 8880 1599862 2279798 0
tcprcvbuf 0 4268 1599862 2279798 0
othersockbuf 14256 14256 799931 1479867 0
dgramrcvbuf 0 0 799931 799931 0
numothersock 11 12 166 166 0
dcachesize 503493 506721 1485297 1529856 0
numfile 1182 1187 2656 2656 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numiptent 64 64 80 80 0
[root@lvps212-241-194-173 root]#
Version: 2.5
uid resource held maxheld barrier limit failcnt
237024: kmemsize 4122064 4169288 6839394 7523333 114456
lockedpages 0 0 333 333 0
privvmpages 49619 49661 194700 214170 0
shmpages 9635 9635 19470 19470 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numproc 41 42 166 166 0
physpages 27650 27653 0 2147483647 0
vmguarpages 0 0 32450 2147483647 0
oomguarpages 28087 28090 32450 2147483647 0
numtcpsock 16 16 166 166 827
numflock 10 10 265 291 0
numpty 2 2 16 16 0
numsiginfo 0 1 1024 1024 0
tcpsndbuf 6660 8880 1599862 2279798 0
tcprcvbuf 0 4268 1599862 2279798 0
othersockbuf 14256 14256 799931 1479867 0
dgramrcvbuf 0 0 799931 799931 0
numothersock 11 12 166 166 0
dcachesize 503493 506721 1485297 1529856 0
numfile 1182 1187 2656 2656 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numiptent 64 64 80 80 0
[root@lvps212-241-194-173 root]#
Maybe not, then! 
Mancot, I know you NEED to comment on every thread, but in this case, you are well out of your depth.
QUOTE (krankie @ Dec 12 2007, 07:49 PM)
Only if you can explain to me this user_beancounters output from the old server
I'm particularly interested in knowing your considered opinion about the 114456 kernel memory failures since the last reboot.
I'm particularly interested in knowing your considered opinion about the 114456 kernel memory failures since the last reboot.
QUOTE
[root@lvps212-241-194-173 root]# cat /proc/user_beancounters
Version: 2.5
uid resource held maxheld barrier limit failcnt
237024: kmemsize 4122064 4169288 6839394 7523333 114456
lockedpages 0 0 333 333 0
privvmpages 49619 49661 194700 214170 0
shmpages 9635 9635 19470 19470 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numproc 41 42 166 166 0
physpages 27650 27653 0 2147483647 0
vmguarpages 0 0 32450 2147483647 0
oomguarpages 28087 28090 32450 2147483647 0
numtcpsock 16 16 166 166 827
numflock 10 10 265 291 0
numpty 2 2 16 16 0
numsiginfo 0 1 1024 1024 0
tcpsndbuf 6660 8880 1599862 2279798 0
tcprcvbuf 0 4268 1599862 2279798 0
othersockbuf 14256 14256 799931 1479867 0
dgramrcvbuf 0 0 799931 799931 0
numothersock 11 12 166 166 0
dcachesize 503493 506721 1485297 1529856 0
numfile 1182 1187 2656 2656 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numiptent 64 64 80 80 0
[root@lvps212-241-194-173 root]#
Version: 2.5
uid resource held maxheld barrier limit failcnt
237024: kmemsize 4122064 4169288 6839394 7523333 114456
lockedpages 0 0 333 333 0
privvmpages 49619 49661 194700 214170 0
shmpages 9635 9635 19470 19470 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numproc 41 42 166 166 0
physpages 27650 27653 0 2147483647 0
vmguarpages 0 0 32450 2147483647 0
oomguarpages 28087 28090 32450 2147483647 0
numtcpsock 16 16 166 166 827
numflock 10 10 265 291 0
numpty 2 2 16 16 0
numsiginfo 0 1 1024 1024 0
tcpsndbuf 6660 8880 1599862 2279798 0
tcprcvbuf 0 4268 1599862 2279798 0
othersockbuf 14256 14256 799931 1479867 0
dgramrcvbuf 0 0 799931 799931 0
numothersock 11 12 166 166 0
dcachesize 503493 506721 1485297 1529856 0
numfile 1182 1187 2656 2656 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numiptent 64 64 80 80 0
[root@lvps212-241-194-173 root]#
is that real computer jargon? sounds like its the computers personal view to some peoples comments made on here.
couldn't get on atall yesterday, but seems to be working great today. thanks krankie.
Its odd,to say the least.
One minute its fine,zooming around,and the next it takes ages for a page to reload.
I'll leave it with you though
One minute its fine,zooming around,and the next it takes ages for a page to reload.
I'll leave it with you though
QUOTE (Caergwrle Blue @ Dec 13 2007, 04:11 PM)
Its odd,to say the least.
One minute its fine,zooming around,and the next it takes ages for a page to reload.
I'll leave it with you though
One minute its fine,zooming around,and the next it takes ages for a page to reload.
I'll leave it with you though
This board is clearly female!!
I'll go and get my own tea dear!!
Sorry guys, I'll leave it alone now to just get on with its job. 
QUOTE (krankie @ Dec 13 2007, 05:00 PM)
Sorry guys, I'll leave it alone now to just get on with its job.
I rest my case!!
So far so good for me today.
Yesterday was off more than on.
Yesterday was off more than on.
QUOTE (Caergwrle Blue @ Dec 17 2007, 11:41 AM)
So far so good for me today.
Yesterday was off more than on.
Yesterday was off more than on.
It's a lottery for me, sometimes easy and the next time no sign of the site at all.
Havn't been able to get on alot within last 2 or 3 days.
Just to jinx things working like a charm the last 24 hours!!
This might help explain that output ..... Virtuozzo Management of System Resources Administrator's Guide.
Can't IP Board help out?
For some reason i cant view who else is reading a board nor can i read posts/topics that are specific to one poster. Ive tried signing in and out many times but to no avail.
I can see who is logged in to DC from the board index but not on each forum.
have not been able to get on a few times, when I have it has been very slow.
have not been able to get on a few times, when I have it has been very slow.
Still having really bad problems accessing DC.
Any luck with the server Krankie?
Any luck with the server Krankie?
QUOTE (Goats 'n Roses @ Jan 7 2008, 09:58 PM)
Still having really bad problems accessing DC.
Any luck with the server Krankie?
Any luck with the server Krankie?
He's disabled Donkey.net users mate
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.